A Publication of:

OSU Extension - Fairfield County

831 College Ave., Suite D, Lancaster, OH 43130

and the

OSU Extension BEEF Team

BEEF Cattle questions may be directed to the OSU Extension BEEF Team through Stephen Boyles or Stan Smith, Editor

You may subscribe to this weekly BEEF Cattle letter by sending a blank e-mail to beef-cattle-on@ag.osu.edu

Previous issues of the BEEF Cattle letter

Issue # 611

November 19, 2008



Timely Marketing of Cull Cows: Every Cattleman's/Dairyman's Responsibility - Ron Torell, University of Nevada Cooperative Extension Livestock Specialist

Short-term, gummer, and smooth-mouth are all terms cattlemen use to describe their older bovine employees. They have produced well for the past 10-12 years. These cows are the experienced veterans of the herd. However, due to age, lack of teeth, and an anticipated decline in production, they are forced to retire. Before issuing her "pink slip" many try to squeeze that last calf, or in the case of dairy cows, that last drop of milk out of her. Humane treatment of animals and timely marketing of these veteran employees as a means of eliminating non-ambulatory cows at sale barns and harvest facilities is every cattleman's responsibility. In this issue of Back to Basics let's address and rethink that last calf and that last drop of milk.

Prices for cull cows are based on their expected USDA carcass grade. The most common grades, in order of the least amount of marbling and dressing percentage to the greatest, are: canner (very thin body condition scores of 2 and 3); cutter (thin body condition score of 4); utility (moderate body condition score of 5); and commercial (fleshy body condition score 6 and above). Both price per pound and dressing percentage significantly increases with the higher body condition score animals. This economically favors marketing these cows in a timely manner prior to them losing body condition and falling into a lower grade. Most non-ambulatory animals are emaciated and would be classified in the canner, very thin body condition score category.

According to Dr. Dan Drake, Yreka, California farm advisor, "A major reason these old cows decline in production and body condition is due to their reduced ability to breakdown feed stuffs. Of course this is primarily due to the loss of the mechanical tools, the teeth. The digestive system of the ruminant is dependent on small particle sizes for proper digestion. Because the particle size of the feed stuffs consumed by these old cows is increased, passage rate is slowed, thus consumption is reduced. Nutrient requirements of these old cows have not increased; rather her consumption and feed efficiency have both decreased. The combination of the two requires that these cows be placed on a more nutrient dense ration with smaller particle size and softer feed. We need to do more of the feed breakdown for the cow," concludes Drake.

Glenn Nader, Yuba County, California farm advisor, agrees with Drake. He also feels that many of these old cows have lost some of the villa in the lining of the digestive tract which adds to the lowered feed efficiency and digestion. Additionally, Nader feels functionality of some internal organs such as the liver and kidney is compromised in many of these old cows. Nader feels that these old cows need to be pampered if they are kept for the last calf. "They can no longer produce with the same feed and under the same conditions as the main cow herd. Rations such as chopped hay with a concentrate work well on these old smooth mouth cows. This is a nutrient dense ration which is high in protein and energy. More importantly, because it is chopped, the particle size of the feed is small. This compensates for the old cows lack of ability to break that feed stuff down herself."

"If you keep these old cows for one more year, you have to manage them differently than the main-cow herd," agrees Dan Gralian, manager of the TS Ranch of Battle Mountain, Nevada and current president of the Nevada Cattlemen's Association. "If you do not provide that extra feed and care, a dink calf and a shelly canner cow is the result. The shelly canner cow is what the industry is trying to avoid through timely and early marketing of these old cows. Shelly canners will dress less than 38 percent and pose a humane treatment issue to the industry. Prevention is always the best cure."

What once worked from a marketing standpoint for Rebel Creek Ranches of Orovada, Nevada may not work today with higher winter feed costs. Ron Cerri, owner/ manager of Rebel Creek Ranch and President-elect of the Nevada Cattlemen's Association would calve these old cows in March and run the pairs inside on irrigated pasture in the spring and early summer. The calves would be weaned at about 170-days of age in mid to late summer with the cow being immediately sold while she still had good body condition. "By timing the marketing of these old cows for late summer the better cull-cow market was hit adding value. This added value offset the added cost of better winter feed for these short-term cows," states Cerri.

Henry Smith, of Brownsville, California makes a living from buying small bunches of bred, short-term cows. "You have to be careful which cows you buy," warns Smith. "Some cows are worn out. They will not produce under any circumstances. We tried the younger cull cows paying as much as $75 per head premium over rail price. Only 50 percent of them worked out. We were always purchasing someone else's problem cows. We now buy old, sound cows and are able to purchase them just over rail price. We have access to by-product feeds here in central California. These old cows do well during the winter. We calve them out, place the pairs on grass until mid to late summer, wean the calf and sell the open cow. We do not run bulls with these old cows and we do not vaccinate for any of the reproductive diseases. We do vaccinate with 7-way and for the respiratory diseases. Our costs are reduced," concludes Smith.

A University of Nevada economic evaluation on heifer development shows that on average, most cows have paid for themselves by age six showing that the longer a cow stays in the herd, the more profitable she becomes. Her production may decline after eleven years of age, so we need to recognize the impact of longevity on the total cost of production. Anything beyond those six years certainly has economic significance. This supports keeping a cow in the herd as long as she is productive and breeds back provided the added cost of winter feed for these aged cows is reasonable, which is currently not the case.

Jon Griggs, manager of Maggie Creek Ranch of Elko, Nevada and Second Vice President of Nevada Cattlemen's Association also sees a need for timely marketing of other age and classes of cattle. "Lump jaw, permanent lameness, bad eyes, poor bags-- catching these ailments early and marketing these cows in a timely manner before these conditions pose a health or humane treatment issue is paramount to our industry's survival," concludes Griggs.

Gralian, Cerri and Griggs, speaking on behalf of the Nevada Cattlemen's Association urge cattlemen and dairymen to practice timely marketing of cull cows. It is every cattleman's responsibility and it is the right thing to do. In light of all the publicity concerning weak and downer cows we need to be especially vigilant of the condition of the cull cows we send to the sale barn or packing plant. The cull cows we ship to market are a reflection on all of us in the industry.

If you are unwilling to harvest these cows for home consumption by family and friends; do not send them to market! The take home message of this article is timely and smart marketing of all cull cows. The days are over of hauling canner spent cows to the sale yard and hoping to retrieve enough cash for gas. Prevent the canner cow; it is the right thing to do.





Forage Focus: How Much Hay Will a Cow Consume? - Glenn Selk, Oklahoma State University Extension Cattle Reproduction Specialist

Estimating forage intake by cows is an important part of the task of calculating winter supplement needs. Producers that wish to be cost efficient in the supplementation feeding this winter, will calculate and feed the most appropriate type and quantity of supplement. Hay or standing forage intake must be estimated in order to make the calculations. Forage quality will be a determining factor in the amount of forage consumed. Higher quality forages contain larger concentrations of important nutrients so animals consuming these forages should be more likely to meet their nutrient needs from the forages. Also animals can consume a larger quantity of higher quality forages.

Higher quality forages are fermented more rapidly in the rumen leaving a void that the animal can fill with additional forage. Consequently, forage intake increases. For example, low quality forages (below about 6% crude protein) will be consumed at about 1.5% of body weight (on a dry matter basis) per day. Higher quality grass hays (above 8% crude protein) may be consumed at about 2.0% of body weight. Excellent forages, such as good alfalfa, silages, or green pasture may be consumed at the rate of 2.5% dry matter of body weight per day. The combination of increased nutrient content AND increased forage intake makes high quality forage very valuable to the animal and the producer. With these intake estimates, now producers can calculate the differences needed to be met with supplement.





Maximizing Winter Grazing Opportunities - Aaron Stalker, Beef Specialist, University of Nebraska West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte, NE.

The USDA Economic Research Service estimates purchased and harvested feeds make up almost half of the annual cow costs. Because purchased and harvested feeds are such a large proportion of the overall costs making significant reductions in this area will help reduce overall costs. One way to reduce harvested feed costs is to extend the grazing season through the winter. Allowing the cow to harvest the forage is less expensive than mechanically harvesting and feeding forage. This is especially true with today's high fuel prices. At the University of Nebraska Gudmundsen Sandhills Laboratory near Whitman, March-calving cows graze native winter range from December through February. These cows are fed 0.3 lbs/day of supplemental protein and experience good pregnancy rates and calf growth performance.

In addition to winter range, grazing of cornstalks during the winter has the potential to reduce harvested feed costs. Historically cornstalks have been an inexpensive feed source and more cornstalks will be produced as a result of greater corn production. University of Nebraska data has shown spring calving cows wintered on cornstalks do not need supplemental protein but this depends on how the cornstalks are managed. A decision support tool has been created to help producers determine appropriate stocking rates, plan acres needed and calculate costs. This tool is called the "Cornstalk

You can find "Cornstalk Grazing Calculator" here





Change is Inevitable But Is It Recognizable? - Dr. Roy Burris, Beef Extension Specialist, University of Kentucky

This day (10/6/08) has been one unlike any other - at least recently. I drove to a meeting and noticed that regular gasoline varied in price by 58¢ per gallon. It is also hard to understand why gasoline is still near $4 per gallon while crude oil is down from a high of about $147 per barrel to $87 today. Talk about lag time! What's going on? The Dow just dropped below 10,000 for the first time in four years. I'm afraid that we are in for a wild ride. Everyone, even politicians, is clamoring for change.

Americans are finally fed up with our dependence on oil - especially foreign oil. I don't doubt that we are in for real change. I just don't know what change will look like or if we will even recognize it when it appears.

It wasn't so many years ago in our nation's rich history that we had another revolution of sorts. Our grandfathers were complacent in their agrarian world. They were busy riding horses for transportation and using horses and mules for work - like plowing the fields. If they needed more horse power, they added another team to the hitch. More efficiency? They just got a smaller horse that ate less hay. Things were pretty simple until one day a T-model came along spluttering, backfiring, and belching smoke. My gosh, how it changed things. I'll bet no one dreamed that we would become so dependent on gasoline or diesel-powered engines. We didn't see it coming or recognize it when it appeared.

Oil companies may have "felt us out" to see how much we are willing to pay for gasoline before we significantly cut back on usage. It seems that figure is around $4 a gallon. They may think that if the price stays below that four dollars, we will stay addicted and not "kick the habit". However, it is my belief that the "genie is out of the bottle" and won't go back in this time.

Do you think that change will come from Detroit? Big oil? Probably not. Who will emerge as agents of change in this era that we are entering into? Do we honestly think that politicians can solve this problem? I would look to "silicon valley" and guess that some new innovation will change the way we move around. That proverbial "little T-model" is about to enter our lives "spluttering and backfiring" again and we may not even see it coming.

What about alternative fuels? Aren't they the answer? Honestly; I believe that feed grains will, in the long term, be used primarily to feed the world population. I am not sure that we have changed fuel efficiency enough for this move to be sustainable. It has, however, made a lot of co-products available for animal feed. Are cellulosic feed stocks more likely to be used? Again, I believe that change might be more drastic than that. We keep trying to feed the internal combustion engine when that might not even be the engine of the future.

So where would these long-term changes leave the cattle industry. I still firmly believe that our future is with forages. That's what we do best - convert forages to meat and milk without minimum competition for the world feed supply. We should continue to position ourselves as environmentally-friendly while providing wholesome, safe food for the world. We should also use legumes in our pastures to avoid expensive nitrogen fertilization.





"Managing Dynamic Change in the Beef Cattle Industry" Registrations are Open

Last week, we introduced this winter's beef cattle production series entitled Managing Dynamic Change. Registration is now open, and may be accomplished by completing the form under this link and mailing it along with your registration fee to the Ohio Cattleman's Association, 10600 U.S. Highway 42, Marysville OH 43040. You may contact OCA at beef@ohiobeef.org or 614.873.6736 for more details.





Visit the OSU Beef Team calendar of meetings and upcoming events



BEEF Cattle is a weekly publication of Ohio State University Extension in Fairfield County and the OSU Beef Team. Contributors include members of the Beef Team and other beef cattle specialists and economists from across the U.S.

All educational programs conducted by Ohio State University Extension are available to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, gender, age, disability or Vietnam-era veteran status. Keith L. Smith, Associate Vice President for Ag. Admin. and Director, OSU Extension. TDD No. 800-589-8292 (Ohio only) or 614-292-1868



Fairfield County Agriculture and Natural Resources